No decision on future SEC football scheduling format at Spring meetings

By Kevin Kelley -

With the Oklahoma Sooners and the Texas Longhorns scheduled to join the SEC in 2025, the future football scheduling format was a primary topic of discussion at the annual SEC Spring meetings in Destin, Fla., this week.

The SEC currently plays an eight-game conference football schedule that consists of six games against the other teams in the division, one permanent cross-division opponent, and one rotating cross-division opponent. That model was previously adopted primarily to preserve longstanding rivalries such as Georgia-Auburn, Alabama-Tennessee, etc.

The downside to that model, however, is that the rotating opponents do not cycle through fast enough. For instance, Texas A&M joined the league in 2012 and didn’t travel to play Georgia until the 2019 season. And under that same format, Georgia will not make the return trip to College Station until 2024, a full 12 years after the Aggies entered the SEC.

Additionally, according to college football writer Matt Smith, there is another crazy scheduling anomaly involving Texas A&M.

With Oklahoma and Texas entering the SEC in 2025, the conference’s membership roster will expand to 16 teams. So keeping the 6-1-1 format would further exacerbate the rotation of non-permanent opponents.

The league will also likely scrap their divisional format now that the NCAA has relaxed their restrictions for conference championship game participants. Previously, conferences had to be split into even divisions in order to stage a championship game.

Per several reports, the SEC has narrowed down their future football scheduling format discussion to two models. The first, dubbed the 1-7 format, is an eight-game conference schedule where each team plays one permanent opponent and seven rotating opponents each season. Under that format, teams would cycle through every other team on their schedule home and away every four years.

The 1-7 format would also allow each SEC team to continue to schedule four non-conference opponents each season.

The second model reportedly under consideration is the 3-6 format, which would consist of three permanent opponents and six rotating opponents. That would also allow each team to play every other team home and away in a four year period.

However, the 3-6 model would see each teams’ non-conference schedule reduced from four to three games. Additionally, a 3-6 model would create an imbalance in the league schedule with four home games and five road games every other season. That could cause issues for some teams that like to play seven or even eight home games each season to obtain additional revenue.

Additionally, adding an extra conference game to the schedule and removing one non-conference game might be detrimental to some league teams (cough, cough…Vanderbilt) in terms of qualifying for a postseason bowl game each year.

Alabama head coach Nick Saban has long been in favor of a nine-game conference schedule, and Florida Director of Athletics Scott Stricklin also favors nine games.

“There is some fatigue in our current scheduling model,” Stricklin told SI.com. “I don’t know where we’re going to end up but it does appear we’re going to have a lot more rotation, so we get to see everybody and every stadium once in a four-year period.”

Whatever the outcome, it won’t be decided this week, according to comments made by SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey earlier on Friday.

SEC Football Schedule

Comments (11)

I don’t want the removal of one non-conference game, if it is kept it would allow a lot of great matchups

I think there should be 3 permanent and 4 rotating opponents for each SEC team. The rotation would be six years. This would open up two non-conference slots for each SEC team, meaning more marquee non-conference games.

The reduction of conference games across the Power 5 may be how we still see Bedlam on the schedule every year despite Oklahoma and Oklahoma State now being in separate conferences.

NINE conference games for ALL Power-5 conferences. This idea of bespoke scheduling to try to maintain as many less-than-two-loss teams as possible is absurd! One conference – limit of one representative in the CFP. Rivalries like Bedlam, the Backyard Brawl, the Boarder War, the Sunshine Showdown, the Holy War, Oklahoma/Nebraska, Penn State/Pitt etc. are of importance primarily to their fan bases. Like Pamela Anderson of 1993 or Sophia Loren of 1957, if they can be preserved fine, if not…

Pair the 3-6 with adding a 13th game in Week -1 vs. FCS opponents. Gives nine conference games, three non-cons, and preserves the extra home game that’s a season opener sort of exhibition.

If they go the 1-7 route, that means either Texas/A&M or Red River Rivalry won’t be an annual matchup. That can’t happen.
However, if 1-7 ends up being the format, these would be the following pairs:

MS/MS St
Bama/Auburn
Flo/Geo

The remaining 5 could go a few ways:
Tex/Okla
A&M/LSU
Ark/Mizz
Vandy/UK
Tenn/SCar

Or

LSU/Ark
Tex/A&M
Okla/Mizz
Vandy/Tenn
UK/SCar

Or

Vandy/SCar
Tenn/UK

If they’re so worried about losing non-conference games then reducing to 7 conference games should be the answer. You play three protected opponents, and four rotating opponents. That will actually INCREASE the amount of OOC games played by SEC schools, and could be a good way to keep Bedlam on the schedule as long as the Big 12 also dials back on conference games.

Or maybe everyone can just go independent and have 12 OOC games.

Seriously, I’m not sure why you keep pushing this idea of 7 conference games but it makes zero sense. What is the point of being in a conference if you’re playing almost as many out of conference games as in conference games?

Conferences get paid for their media rights because they play games… AGAINST EACH OTHER – not OCC opponents.

I do. Honestly wish Oklahoma State would’ve tagged along. But there is still zero chance they will go to 7 conference games. Best they can hope for is one of the other schools decides to pair up with a Big 12 team to end the season. If Missouri can pair up with Iowa State or Kansas, then that’ll even things up. Interested to see how Thanksgiving weekend will play out.

If you want an ideal world, LSU ends with Tulane, Arkansas ends with Memphis, Missouri ends with Nebraska, Iowa/Iowa St., Kansas/Kansas St., Oklahoma/Okla. St., etc.

The decision that allowed Texas and Oklahoma to be admitted into the SEC involved ONLY the University of Texas, the University of Oklahoma and the SEC. There was no “tag along” option. An ideal world would never include end-of-the-season match ups involving SEC programs versus lesser schools from the lesser American Conference. The Kentucky/Louisville game was mandated (during in the 1990’s) by the legislature of the State of Kentucky. As far a continuing Bedlam… there were those that lamented the end of the Chicago vs. Michigan rivalry as well.